Using Tasers for Self-Defense

Controversy over the use of tasers by lawcarry easily in the palm of the hand or tucked
enforcement offers continues to brew with acarefully in a handbag.
number of highly publicized death-by-taserMost experts agree that when used correctly and
incidents reported in the last several months.carefully, tasers are a very effective method for
Included is the death of a Polish man in thesubduing a would-be attacker. Women tend to be
Vancouver International Airport in October, 2007.more vulnerable targets for personal crimes than
Robert Dziekanski was in the process ofmen. It makes sense for manufacturers to target
immigrating to Canada from his native Poland.female consumers. Many women who do not feel
Dziekanski arrived in Canada speaking very littlecomfortable when carrying a gun for personal
English, and was forced to wait in customs forprotection report feeling at ease with a taser
over 10 hours. Apparently, no interpreter wasclose at hand. There are other difficulties
available to help Dziekanski through this veryassociated with firearms as well. Guns are typically
confusing process. He became increasinglyharder to access, more difficult to purchase and
agitated over his treatment and his inability tonot necessarily carried legally on one's person. It's
communicate with airport officials. Police werenot a stretch to see why tasers are gaining
eventually called to deal with the disgruntledpopularity in the self-defense product market.
traveler. Officers spoke with Mr. Dziekanski (againMany experts say that comparing the use of
in English) for less than 30 seconds beforetasers by law enforcement to using one for
subduing Mr. Dziekanski with a taser.self-defense is like comparing apples to oranges.
Tasers are lauded around North America as aWhile the weapon may be the same, the issues
more humane way to deal with threateningsurrounding their use are completely different.
individuals than firearms. There have been,Police are being criticized of reaching tasers too
however, a number of fatalities from the use ofquickly rather than mediating or using other less
these devices. Unfortunately, Dziekanski becameviolent tactics to subdue a criminal. A civilian facing
one of those statistics when the shock deliveredthe imminent threat of an attack doesn't have
by a taser stopped his heart and led to his death.the option of "talking things out" with an attacker.
This begs the question: should the general publicIn fact, many experts concede that tasers are a
have access to tasers for self-defense?highly effective means of protecting oneself from
Almost every state in the U.S. (approximately 43an imminent attack. When used correctly, a taser
of 50) allows the sale and limited use of tasersdelivers an electrical shock (50,000 volts in the
for self-defense. Even as the controversycase of the C2) that temporarily disables an
surrounding their use boiled, a new taser wasattacker, allowing time to escape the situation.
introduced into the market in mid-2007. WhileWhile the controversy over the use of tasers by
tasers for personal use have been around forlaw enforcement won't end any time soon, tasers
over a decade, this most recent release was aare growing in popularity amongst the general
so-called "designer" version, marketed largely atpublic as the self-defense product of choice. More
women. The C2 Taser has been described asconvenient than a gun, and more effective than
"eye-catching" and a little bit less "Dirty Harry"mace or pepper spray, tasers may emerge as
than the typical police-issue variety. It slightlythe number one self-defense weapon in the next
resembles an electric razor and is small enough todecade.