The necessity of critical thinking in Martial Arts

As a scientist, I have often encountered teacherstrue… but with little results as is shown in this
who considered the epistemological approach asvideo ( where a Ki master gets punished by a
an aberration in the study of a Budo, sometimesMMA fighter. About MMA, these lots have their
even like an insult directed towards their work orown belief system too but I will spare them for a
their own persona. Today, I would like to discusssubsequent article.
the benefits there are in studying a JapaneseBesides exposing a fraud, this video illustrates
martial art (taking my own speciality, Aikido asquite vividly the auto mystification that this so
example) while keeping in mind what thecalled master suffers from. It is one thing to put
Enlightened have brought to us.your students in danger by teaching them mumbo
We are living in a time where pseudoscience andjumbo but it is an entirely different thing to put
superstition enjoy a great popularity. This wouldyourself in the ring. The bottom line is that to do
be quite harmless if it was not undermining ourso, you have to firmly believe in your stuff. This
critical thinking and by extension, our generalvideo also leads to an interesting reflection when
knowledge. The human brain has this tendency towe realise that it is probably his own students, by
seek for meaning within all the experiences thattheir submissive attitude, who led their master to
we encounter every day. While this capacity issuch degrees of self deception; who said there
essential for helping individuals to make sense ofwas no justice? Coming back to the first video, it
the various stimuli that they are constantlyis interesting to notice that it shows a very
subjected to, it sometimes misfires, leaving us inpowerful feat of the human mind: the power of
desperate “need” of quick and simplesuggestion. The students, while they are
explanations to concepts that can be difficult toconvinced by the powers of their teacher,
grasp. According to Daniel C. Dennett, a famousbecome automatically much more susceptible to
professor in cognitive sciences; the fact thatsuggestion. As we see, they fall down and suffer
science admits holding only a limited amount ofof an acceleration of their pulse accompanied by
knowledge can become so intolerable for our spiritan abundant sweating. On the opposite, sceptic
that we will tend to seek elsewhere somestrangers remain unaffected if somewhat amused
absolute truths, unchanging and thereforeafter being subjected to these contact less
reassuring: dogmas. It is in these gaps left bystrikes. The famous astrophysicist Carl Sagan
science that we can often find the mostonce said “extraordinary claims require
detestable methods and discourses.extraordinary evidences”. The point is that it
The essential challenge for today’s martial artis up to the people coming up with these special
practitioner is to manage dealing with a certainfeats to give the proof of their existence, the
duality. The strict etiquette of our arts makes itreasonable attitude being to remain sceptic unless
rather difficult to explore and experiment on newproved otherwise.
ideas. Although progress only comes from aBut what about all this progress that we inherited
critical state of mind, these notions are quitefrom the Enlightenment? Is it really a good thing
unwelcome within a dojo. Indeed it would beand is it transmissible to Aikido practice? It is well
intolerable to see a student interrupting endlesslyaccepted that our society as a whole is less
the class, asking for further explanations oraggressive and more open; exchanges between
contradicting the teacher. What is there to docountries having never been so rich and numerous
then? How can we make cohabit in the most(unless racism, obscurantism, religious
fulfilling manner a heritage coming from the timesfundamentalism and greed come back into action).
of Samurai with a modern thought process, all thisFrom an individual’s point of view, we live
without having one undermining the other?longer, more comfortably and we are in better
Within religion, belief in the absence of evidence ishealth. Of course, everything is not perfect and
considered as a virtue but if carried within theconsecutively to these waves of progress, we
practice of martial arts, it becomes a problem. Ofhave had to face new crucial challenges such as
course the comparison Aikido/religion does notglobal warming, reduction of biodiversity, increased
seem pertinent to me since Aikido has not beenneeds in food and drinking water and so on. I
conceived in such a way by its creator (see thethink, however, that the attitude which consists in
interview of André Nocquet, a direct student ofrejecting everything modern while saying
O Sensei Ueshiba). It is not, of course, in our“things used to be better” shows a great
ideals of peace, neither in our codes, nor in ourincapacity in apprehending the present. The
rituals that we have to seek for a religiousChinese philosopher, father of taoism, Lao Tzu
manifestation. Every sport has its own codes andillustrated this fear of progress very well more
these are more rooted within a warfare heritagethan 2000 years ago when he said
(teams/armies, colours/uniforms, position on the“experience is like a candle attached to
pitch/battlefield) than a religious practice. However,one’s back, it only lights up the path already
I happen to think that it is precisely in thetravelled”. Let us be serious for a moment,
intellectual submission and in the acceptation ofand youngster, even if he spends more time than
anything and everything that we tend to leanis really good for him in front of the TV watching
towards the religious.Fame Academy is not dumber than its
I have heard on many occasions teachers claimingcounterpart 100 years ago, he is of course far
that they, and no one else, held the only truemore educated. It is also a bit dishonest to
Aikido, as O Sensei was doing it. They generallycriticize progress when one benefits from all the
illustrate these claims by opposing their approachadvantages of living in an industrialised country
to the one of other teachers, implying that thesewhere we can have access to scanners,
poor souls are doing fake Aikido if not, no Aikidochemo-therapies and where the infantile mortality
at all. The reasonable stance is to stay sceptical inis amongst the lowest in the world. Fortunately
front of those who hold these kinds offor the human species, this reactionary stance is
discourses, if only because such claims are bynot the common feeling and to only talk of what
definition mutually exclusive: if one is right,I know well, I would like to salute the outstanding
therefore all the others are wrong. How, aswork of the great majority of biologists who
critical, yet open minded practitioners, can we getwork on how to resolve the major issues that
out of this nonsense? Obviously, we cannotour planet faces in spite of a distrustful public
challenge all our teachers in a deadly fight or askopinion and unhelpful governmental policies.
them to privately demonstrate to us their mightFor me, it is precisely this incapacity to question
at each class. Keep in mind that we are practicingthings which is our greatest challenge in traditional
a Do, not a Jutsu. On the other hand, the attitudemartial arts. We have this tendency to raise some
of being slightly sceptical should not necessarily bepeople up to the status of icons possessing
considered as a lack of respect. A sceptic isunreachable mastery. Of course, we do this, only
someone rather curious, and interested in manyrelying on great deals of tales and second hand
things. If otherwise, he would not invest time andstories about their supposed supernatural
energy into studying a discipline or a subject. Thecapacities. MMA practitioners and other
most important thing to keep in mind is that acompetitors have understood this well and mock
sceptic is by default ready to accept anything asus about this quite often. It is capital for us to
long as a convincing body of evidence is presentaccept the idea that we can and we should
to support the phenomenon. As descendants ofbecome better than our masters on a physical
the Enlightened, we should be sceptical budoka,level as much as on a mental one. If Aikido did
critical towards ourselves, our knowledge and ournot evolve or improve but on the contrary,
art while respecting our teacher and the essencesuffered from the fact that each student could
of our discipline. We must of course stay opennot become better than his master, there would
minded and lucid in front of our own ignorance inbe very little remaining of what Aikido’s
many subjects. Here is a difficult task to carryfounder Morihei Ueshiba created. Somebody like
out, but not a dichotomy however!Ueshiba Sensei was very ahead of his time in
In some places, the sheer fact of pronouncing theterms of mentality with his universalistic vision and
word “scientific” becomes an insult, ahis insistence on the peaceful resolution of a
“faux pas” that the experiencedconflict while at a time of global war and living in
practitioner would never commit and that thean ultra-nationalist country. He was a hero of his
novice would be barely forgiven for. The wordstime but to the light of today’s moral values,
“non-overlapping magisteria” that we owehis opinions can now sound as very retrograde.
to the prestigious palaeontologist, Stephen J.Another vivid example is Abraham Lincoln, the
Gould, often come back to my mind. According toheroic 16th American president who, by
Gould, there are domains in which science has notoday’s standards, would be considered a
right of entry. Although he is clearly referring toracist and a bully. These people are therefore
esoteric matters and religion, I think that a lot ofmodels in the context of their time but they
people which I would describe as “mysticalcannot escape the criticism of our current society
frauds” would gladly see this rule be applied inand the investigation using our modern knowledge.
martial arts too. We often hear people say that aIt is our duty to do better than them, we now
discipline that has existed for a thousand yearsknow better!
cannot be wrong or else, it would not have lastedIn Aikido, we must give up the kind of discourses
for so long. I would say that on the contrary, ifheld by those who do the only true Aikido of the
the discipline in question has not changedfounder because we saw earlier that these kinds
(progressed) along with our general knowledge, itof statements are unreasonable. The only person
is very likely that it will be plain wrong, or in thewho did the founder’s Aikido was the founder
best case scenario, enormously incomplete. Takehimself. Indeed, what we do is different but we
the theory of relativity as an example, it ismust embrace this fact in order to go forward
agreed that any reasonably good graduateand make our discipline enter the 21st century
student in Physics understands relativity betterproudly, not turning our backs to the future like
than Einstein ever did. I let you draw the parallelthe orphans of a patriarch that we never actually
with Aikido if you feel like it… The consequenceeven met. We must see in each student of Aikido
of this is that science has heroes and textsan opportunity for a new reflection, a new
containing groundbreaking ideas but no prophetssensibility, a new interpretation of the fundamental
and certainly no books of revelations. This crucialprinciples that the founders showed us and
difference is the condition sine qua non for anycertainly not like a corruption of Ueshiba’s
progress to occur.teachings. This is precisely our critical thinking that
To come back to Stephen J. Gould’swill keep us from this degeneration and allow us
proposition and although I have the greatestan evolution.
respect for his work, I would have to say that onTo conclude, I am far from denying all that is not
the contrary to what he said, I think that it isexplainable in martial arts, I would even say that it
crucial that science should be left free tois obvious to anyone who looks that the great
investigate every aspect of our humanmasters of martial arts perform outstanding
experience. Science has no agenda, no dogma; afeats. However, it is only if we keep an open
scientific theory is doomed to always eventuallymind, critical thinking but also a respectful attitude
being proved wrong or incomplete and to bethat we will be able to access to the mastery of
replaced by a better one more in accordance withthese things. They seem only supernatural
the facts; reality. Science is the spirit filled withbecause we do not understand them well and
wonder of the child that discovers andbecause we tend to mystify them. Supernatural
experiences the surrounding world free from alland godly is always located at the limit of our
preconceptions. It is however true that scienceknowledge. Even Newton, the brightest mind that
currently lacks the tools necessary for the studywalked this earth could not help but feeling that
of phenomenon such as Ki but nothing leads toway. Whether we are talking about Ki or judicious
think that it won’t change. We shouldtiming and placement while respecting the
therefore stay open minded but also critical asphysiological axis (bio-mechanics), it is through this
regards to claims that some ill intentioned or illshift of perspective that we will truly reach a
informed people might make.deeper and more thorough understanding of our
While we are talking about Ki, I always wondereddiscipline. An analogy could be a child who would
why the most famous masters had this tendencywatch a stage magic show in amazement from
to only demonstrate their prowess on their onthe audience and later, would go to see the show
students. The reason which is often given to us isagain from backstage. In Aikido, it is when we try
that it would be “too dangerous, that it takesto be more Japanese than the Japanese that we
training to be able to take it”. There is a gooddeny our inheritance because in these times, we
example in this video (deny to ourselves the possibility to apprehend our
Right, in boxing; you don’t give an uppercutdiscipline with our own occidental sensitivity in spite
to a beginner. This argument sounds reasonableof the fact that this art has been conceived to be
but it unfortunately also makes their claims harduniversal.
to verify. The question I am asking is purposefullyDescartes taught us to ask questions so let’s
direct but not impertinent, nor disrespectful (Idare asking them, but let’s do it politely,
really mean this but I also know that some peoplerespectfully and let’s stay open to all that this
will jump on any occasion to justify them feelinguniverse has of mysteries and wonders but
offended; be my guest). It is honestly and withoutwithout pouring the syrup of superstition all over it
malice that I ask these questions. After spendingand without wrapping it with the cheap, shiny
many years practicing budo and looking for thesepaper of mystification. This, to me, is the key to
manifestations, it is actually likely that deep inside,build up this famous golden bridge that should
I kind of wish that all these incredible powersunite Orient and Occident so the two can at last
exist. There are a few people who have acceptedunderstand each other well.
challenges to prove that their prowess were